labor laws cases Can Be Fun For Anyone
labor laws cases Can Be Fun For Anyone
Blog Article
77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and inside the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
The main target is around the intention to cause injury. This is often a major challenge: a very reduced threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.
Case files may also be accessed from the public access terminals during the clerk’s office with the court where the case was filed.
Section 302 with the Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to act as a deterrent and copyright the value of human life. The application on the death penalty or life imprisonment depends on the specifics of each and every case, like any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.
The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is an extensive bit of legislation that defines a variety of criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for people found guilty.
The recent amendment to Section 489-F of the Pakistan Penal Code signifies a progressive step towards effectively combatting counterfeiting activities. Through its expanded scope, heightened penalties, and technological considerations, the amendment aligns the law with contemporary challenges.
In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty to the accused who intentionally murdered the victim.
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
thirteen. The Supreme Court has held that as soon as the act of misconduct is established plus the employee is found guilty after because of process of legislation, it's the prerogative of the employer to decide the quantum of punishment, away from the different penalties provided in regulation. The casual or unpremeditated observation that the penalty imposed is just not proportionate with the seriousness of the act of misconduct will not be satisfactory however the order must show that the competent authority has applied its mind and exercised the discretion inside of a structured and lawful method. Read more
I) The above referred case FIR, for that murder of deceased namely Muhammad Sajjad, was registered within the complaint of Muhammad Sharif son of Ghulam Farid that's father in the petitioner and According to story of FIR, the petitioner is undoubtedly an eyewkness of your incidence.
Hence, it had been held that the right into a healthy environment read more was part of the fundamental right to life and right to dignity, under Article 9 and 14 of your Pakistan Constitution, respectively. The Court ruled that the word “life” covers all facets of human existence, all these types of amenities and services that a person is entitled to love with dignity, legally and constitutionally.
10. Without touching the merits of your case in the issue of once-a-year increases during the pensionary emoluments with the petitioner, in terms of policy decision of your provincial government, this sort of annual increase, if permissible in the case of employees of KMC, requires further assessment to become made because of the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance due to funding issues and lack of adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to pursue other legal avenues. Read more
In order to preserve a uniform enforcement with the laws, the legal system adheres towards the doctrine of stare decisis
The decision further directed the government of Pakistan to establish a commission of internationally known and acknowledged scientists to review and rule on upcoming grid station projects. In addition, the Court ordered WAPDA to immediately introduce public consultation and objection procedures for all projects concerning grid stations and power traces.